Open elwayman02 opened 8 years ago
I know it's defined as part of the Videos API, but for us, I'm thinking /channels/:channel/videos
should actually be handled by our channels model/adapter/serializer. Does that sound right, @elwayman02? -- I'm debating whether I should leave it out of my videos-api
branch at leave it for when we fully go after channels. (Or if covering both at once would actually be more beneficial.)
Ah, just checked the docs, and /channels/:channel/videos
is actually listed for the Channels API as well. With that in mind, I'd say it's definitely best to go for it then.
DOCS