Closed yunhao94 closed 4 years ago
Yeah that would probably be better than what we have now. I'm not sure if lispy-down is one to one with sp-next-sexp though.
IMHO, the purpose of calling sp-next-sexp is to make the cursor to a special state. Although lispy-down may not be one to one with sp-next-sexp, it just works for this case.
Changed.
https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil-collection/blob/eb36c82a84d313e961777dc78fd4ff1d718efdf6/modes/lispy/evil-collection-lispy.el#L73
I found that
sp-next-sexp
here is a function defined insmartparens
, butsmartparens
is not a dependency oflispy
. Would it be better to replace thesp-next-sexp
withlispy-down
or other functions defined inlispy
?