Closed malb closed 7 months ago
There might be a reason I'm missing why :raw nil
was set, but I figured a PR that you can accept and decline is quicker than an issue first.
I don't think there was a reason why :raw nil
was added, atleast not what I can gather from the commit history. I don't think setting :raw t
would hurt anything, it is a better setting anyways since that is what the user types in at the REPL.
If raw is nil then with SageMath kernels the history we're getting is
Integer(1) + Integer(2)
if1+2
was issued as a command before, i.e. SageMath does some heavy processing of inputs.