Closed jakejx closed 3 years ago
We should use lsp-render-symbol
instead (so this should be closed), see this PR #73. This was the intended use case for that function. Here is how it would look with my PR instead:
You can customize
lsp-signature-face
to change the look of the signature. The point is that we don't duplicate the same symbol rendering code everywhere, with differing feature levels (deprecated highlighting, signature display) in various parts of lsp-mode
.
Thank you for the PR but I am closing it in favour of #73
After 1dbc202fe61b48c94ed872df80403456f51bf46c, when
lsp-treemacs-detailed-outline
ist
, the name of the symbol is not included in the tree and only the detail is rendered. This is a small fix to include the name. Based on the spec,detail
only includes additional information, so the name should always be rendered