Open ejmr opened 11 years ago
As an emacs-lisper I am a huge advocate of REPLs and think php-mode should have one, however - I don't think anyones arguing the flaws that are present with PHPs built in interactive shell. It has almost no features, and fatal errors leave it unrecoverable.
However, boris
has active development, and exists on packagist. I was able to find php-boris-minor-mode which seems like a good alternative.
Assuming the minor mode works well (admittedly I haven't tried it, or inf-php
for that matter), the only con I can see to this is requiring the user install a 3rd party package to take advantage of the feature.
What are your thoughts on boris as opposed to inf-php?
I have used both but not so much that I feel confident picking one over the other. I just happened to use inf-php
first, hence this issue.
That said, I believe a better approach is to allow both by creating a generic way in PHP Mode to launch a REPL and then let users customize that, providing instructions on how to get inf-php
and boris
, and any others that come along in the future. Some users are going to prefer one over the other, and I cannot think of any technical difficulties off the top of my head that would make it a burden to support different REPLs.
Takayuki Sato's
inf-php
package provides a useful way to run an interactive PHP session. It is a much better version of the existingphp-send-region
command. We should remove that command and defer toinf-php
instead. Futhermore, we also need to make sure that no key-bindings ininf-php
conflict with bindings in PHP Mode.