Closed Guillawme closed 6 years ago
Oops sorry, I should have done some research before submitting this. 😕 Next time I will check the PR history before submitting something.
Now that rranelli/auto-package-update.el#32 is merged, should we reopen this PR?
I know you wanted the apu-*
variables renamed with the same prefix as the rest of the package (auto-package-update
), but as it is now that would already work ok.
I updated my fork accordingly, see Guilz/no-littering@a3f3955b82b7c47fbd39a7045897a2982ff203f0 but because this PR is closed it didn't pick up the new commit.
@tarsius would you be OK to merge this PR, now that rranelli/auto-package-update.el#36 is merged? (I think it addresses your main concern about naming user-exposed variables).
Repository for
auto-package-update
: https://github.com/rranelli/auto-package-update.elTheme:
apu--last-update-day-filename
apu--last-update-day-path
The variable ending in
-path
actually also points to the file. This file contains the timestamp of the last automatic package update.Without this
no-littering
rule,auto-package-update
will put this file in~/.emacs.d/.last-package-update-day
.