search

emanuele45 / prettyurls

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/prettyurls
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Without caching modification #99

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I know cache table is very good idea and i like it. But i see more request
for this. Maybe you can add new extras package ? And this package should
remove caching system on pretty urls?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by vazgec on 26 Jul 2009 at 2:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
It's a trade off - database space for performance. If the cache table is too 
big then you need a better host.

Original comment by curiousdannii on 8 Sep 2010 at 2:55