Closed PaoloS02 closed 3 years ago
This works when I add in to the tests I can run on M1 Mac. I'm not sure of the significance of the size/time numbers in the benchmark source. They don't seem to align with the figures I get for M1.
Thanks @Roger-Shepherd I guess you set the value of SZ as 1000 to check that, right? It could make sense to remove the results in the comments or to comment as a "broad reference" as they were not obtained in the embench infrastructure. It would be pretty demanding to collect the binaries that achieve those numbers and compare in order to understand how the size measurement was made for those. same for the execution time.
Thanks @Roger-Shepherd I guess you set the value of SZ as 1000 to check that, right?
No!
It could make sense to remove the results in the comments or to comment as a "broad reference" as they were not obtained in the embench infrastructure. It would be pretty demanding to collect the binaries that achieve those numbers and compare in order to understand how the size measurement was made for those. same for the execution time.
Yes. Certainly something saying they aren't comparable because (i) SZ, (ii) methodology
I will clarify that in the comment then. Thanks for the update
I added a comment that clarifies this. Ready to merge.
Good to merge.
The test primecount searches and counts the prime numbers up to a given limit. This version of the test is a reduction of the test proposed by Bruce Hoult. The limit has been reduced in order to fit the execution time on a Cortex M4 working at 16 MHz into 4 seconds.
Files changed:
Thanks to Bruce Hoult bruce@hoult.org for providing the test.