Closed rwjblue closed 5 years ago
Squatting on a folder is something I'm not a huge fan of, but this is a pretty common scenario and we have precedent. Consider this a mild :+1:.
Couldn't have said it better than @nathanhammond. Big yes to first class support. Bikeshedding on folder API necessary though IMO.
I'm :+1: on this. Though, if we opt for a non-root folder, then we should likely consider updating the structure for blueprints as well (IMO).
Today, if you would like to add a command you must add an in-repo addon that implements the
includedCommands
method.Contrast this with the ease of making a built-in blueprint: simply place a file in
blueprints/some-name/index.js
and 💥 everything works.This issue is mostly to gauge interest in supporting auto-detection of project and addon commands by way of a specific location on disk (e.g.
<project-root>/commands
or<project-root>/lib/commands
)...👍 / 👎 ?