search

emilypi / Base16

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
4 stars 8 forks source link

Please bump base bound for 0.3.2.1 to < 4.20 #31

Closed tomjaguarpaw closed 5 months ago

tomjaguarpaw commented 5 months ago

Both of these work, so could you please make a Hackage revision to bump the bound for base on base16-0.3.2.1 to < 4.20? It's currently at < 4.18.

emilypi commented 5 months ago

base16-1.0 supports <4.20 though, so there's your motivation to upgrade. I don't subscribe to the policy of "support old versions forever on as many base versions as possible". I progress my libraries and test only the GHC's I can reasonably automate and locally support. If you want to maintain that particular version of base16 longer, you have a remedy: fork.

emilypi commented 5 months ago

Closed because I fail to see how twitter callouts are necessary in what I thought was a goodwill line of communication.

tomjaguarpaw commented 4 months ago

Sorry if what I said on Twitter sounded rude. That wasn't my intention and I wasn't "calling out". I was intending to share information with an interested party (Moritz).

tomjaguarpaw commented 4 months ago

(And you can see I didn't mention you by name or Twitter handle in the discussion, exactly because it wasn't a "call out". I was trying to be helpful to Moritz, that's all.)

emilypi commented 4 months ago

You directly linked to this issue with a comment that could be interpreted in context as "i am unsatisfied with this response" (You), which was already in the context of "Emily did something annoying I don't like" (Moritz). Your nitpicks over what constitutes a "callout" are wrong - you're drawing negative public criticism unnecesarily to what is a completely resolvable issue with talking. That is a callout by definition.

If you come onto my projects asking me for labor and then pester me about it publicly when I'm trying to address your rationale, you didn't come in requesting labor. You came in demanding it. That is where we have a problem.

tomjaguarpaw commented 4 months ago

You are welcome to your interpretation of course. The interpretation you describe here does not match my intentions and I regret having caused offence.