Closed rust1248 closed 1 year ago
Hi, I think this relates to the follow comment about the documentation:
In almost all cases, the documentation is taken from the proc.5 manual page. This means that sometimes the style of writing is not very “rusty”, or may do things like reference related files (instead of referencing related structs). Contributions to improve this are welcome.
So most of this documentation is taking from the proc.5
man page, and it wasn't modified to be more suitable for this crate. So we should fix the procfs documentation. Thanks for reporting the issue
Do you want me to open a pull request? If yes, should I just update it to The filename of the executable, without the parentheses.
I would be happy to get a PR for this. Yes, The filename of the executable, without the parentheses.
sounds good to me
The documentation says:
What I understood was that the parentheses were included in the field. I was surprised to see it without.