des %>%
record_vars(student = c(quiz1, quiz2),
class = c(teacher, location))
Which reads as "record variables quiz1, quiz2 for each student and teacher, location for class".
But this is contrary with other functions where variables that are created are on LHS, e.g. set_units(plot = 3).
So if we follow this principle that newly created variables are on LHS then it should be something like
des %>%
record_vars(quiz1 = of(student, unit = "%"),
quiz2 = of(student, unit = "%"),
teacher = of(class),
location = of(class))
with also giving an option to specify unit or other information.
But this is quite tedious if there are so many record variables! So maybe the solution is to use the original with another verb
des %>%
record_vars_of(student = c("quiz1", "quiz2"),
class = c("teacher", "location"))
so the sentence is more like "record variables of student: quiz1, quiz2; record variables of class: teacher, location". The record variables are quoted as per thinking in #24 . Additionally, an option to record units for this can be something like
des %>%
record_vars_of(student = c(trait("quiz1", unit = "%"), trait("quiz2", unit = "%")),
class = c("teacher", "location"))
This is more acceptable to break-away from LHS=new variable since the function deviates away from <verb>_<noun> set up and this serves as a signal to the user that maybe this has a different setup.
Another option is to substitute vars with traits. The word traits though can have different associations in different fields. Also another part to watch out is that there is a function igraph::traits so potential namespace clash needs to be considered. (Noting though this function in igraph looks like for a particular use case that is unlikely to be needed).
Current API:
Which reads as "record variables quiz1, quiz2 for each student and teacher, location for class". But this is contrary with other functions where variables that are created are on LHS, e.g.
set_units(plot = 3)
. So if we follow this principle that newly created variables are on LHS then it should be something likewith also giving an option to specify unit or other information. But this is quite tedious if there are so many record variables! So maybe the solution is to use the original with another verb
so the sentence is more like "record variables of student: quiz1, quiz2; record variables of class: teacher, location". The record variables are quoted as per thinking in #24 . Additionally, an option to record units for this can be something like
This is more acceptable to break-away from LHS=new variable since the function deviates away from
<verb>_<noun>
set up and this serves as a signal to the user that maybe this has a different setup.Another option is to substitute
vars
withtraits
. The wordtraits
though can have different associations in different fields. Also another part to watch out is that there is a functionigraph::traits
so potential namespace clash needs to be considered. (Noting though this function inigraph
looks like for a particular use case that is unlikely to be needed).