Doublecheck the sample IDs and make sure they correspond to the correct samples.
Due to the way they were created in the logsheets, based on the erroneous size_frac_up and size_frac_low columns (see also here), the source_mat_id_orig was the "correct" one and the source_mat_id was the "wrong" one.
E.g. "EMO BON ROSKOGO Wa 210618 3µm_1" became "EMOBON_ROSKOGO_Wa_210618_200um_1"
See https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-002/run-information-batch-002.csv https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-002/ena-accession-numbers-batch-002.csv
and https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-001/run-information-batch-001.csv https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-001/ena-accession-numbers-batch-001.csv
Here are the submitted checklists to ENA https://github.com/emo-bon/ena-sample-registration-action/issues/4
Doublecheck the sample IDs and make sure they correspond to the correct samples. Due to the way they were created in the logsheets, based on the erroneous size_frac_up and size_frac_low columns (see also here), the source_mat_id_orig was the "correct" one and the source_mat_id was the "wrong" one. E.g. "EMO BON ROSKOGO Wa 210618 3µm_1" became "EMOBON_ROSKOGO_Wa_210618_200um_1"