Doublecheck the batch 1 and batch 2 run accessions

[cpavloud]

See https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-002/run-information-batch-002.csv https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-002/ena-accession-numbers-batch-002.csv

and https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-001/run-information-batch-001.csv https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-001/ena-accession-numbers-batch-001.csv

Here are the submitted checklists to ENA https://github.com/emo-bon/ena-sample-registration-action/issues/4

Doublecheck the sample IDs and make sure they correspond to the correct samples. Due to the way they were created in the logsheets, based on the erroneous size_frac_up and size_frac_low columns (see also here), the source_mat_id_orig was the "correct" one and the source_mat_id was the "wrong" one. E.g. "EMO BON ROSKOGO Wa 210618 3µm_1" became "EMOBON_ROSKOGO_Wa_210618_200um_1"

[cpavloud]

Ok! So, the files in the sequencing-data have now changed. See the updated files: https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-001/run-information-batch-001.csv https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-001/ena-accession-numbers-batch-001.csv

https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-002/run-information-batch-002.csv https://github.com/emo-bon/sequencing-data/blob/main/shipment/batch-002/ena-accession-numbers-batch-002.csv

Tomorrow I will add the new source_mat_id in the samples in ENA and I will make them public.

[cpavloud]

Luckily, when I first created the sample accessions in ENA, I had corrected the wrong size fractions, so I don't have to change anything regarding this in ENA.