Test possible resolution to suppress records that ONLY have unavailable electronic holdings

[lovinscari]

Per our discussion on 2/28/22, I would like to test the logic presented by @lisahamlett to not show any records that (1) has no 997, (2) has at least one 998, and (3) all 998s are "Not Available" regardless of 856 Aka “suppress records that ONLY have unavailable electronic holdings”

@bwatson78 - I am assigning this ticket to you since you were in the meeting yesterday. Please reach out to @lisahamlett if there are any questions about the logic presented. Once deployed to Test, I will ask Sofia and Kat to test. If this seems to resolve the issue they presented, I will ask a few others to test to ensure no adverse behavior.

[bwatson78]

PR: https://github.com/emory-libraries/blacklight-catalog/pull/1231

I attempted to test this code with the blacklightemily set, but it's 998e field equals Available, while it's individual record XML states it as Not Available.

[eporter23]

@bwatson78 hoping we can chat a little bit about this. @lovinscari is going to set up a brief meeting for us. This works well per the ticket description but one thing we have noticed in test is that now none of the collections/databases are discoverable, not sure if this is related to the work in this ticket or not.

[bwatson78]

@eporter23 I accepted the invite.

[bwatson78]

Just to summarize what's currently in Production: after a discussion awhile back with @lisahamlett, we reviewed our current logic in place and determined that the only missing ruling was that we allowed records with only deactivated portfolios that also had 856s to be indexed. The solution was to remove the 856 field blocker--now, the logic doesn't analyze whether the records in question even have 856s.

[tclayton33]

Consulted w/ Emily. Closing this issue - we can create a new ticket to do additional work if new information is discovered, or there are new reports of problems.