As a user I need to be able to find tree species within Arapaho/Roosevelt Nat Forest

empowerai / fs-permit-platform

Module for intake of special use applications for Forest Service Application Permits

Other

3 stars 0 forks source link

As a user I need to be able to find tree species within Arapaho/Roosevelt Nat Forest #33

Open sadlerw opened 6 years ago

sadlerw commented 6 years ago

Acceptance Criteria

for each forest you can see the information on species and size
size of stump (e.g. six inches or smaller - can vary for each forest/species)
positioning of tree to other trees (opening up span)
height of the tree

Definition of Done

[x] Server Code unit / e2e tested and comply with QWASP
[x] Frontend Code unit tested and comply with QWASP
[x] Frontend Code e2e tested and comply with QWASP
[x] No new security vulnerabilities
[x] Team code review
[x] Documentation / readme.md / CircleCI updated
[x] Docker updated
[x] Compare finished design with mockup
[x] Usability tested
[x] Design deliverables committed

Tasks

[ ] approval of content (Amber & Colin)
[x] research to find content on existing web sites (Will)
[x] modify seeders and add missing images
[x] editing/creation of content
[x] a11y

sadlerw commented 6 years ago

from handout: Expect to find primarily Lodgepole pine (10), some sub-alpine fir (15) and a few Engelmann spruce (1)

website says: Ponderosa pine (5), lodgepole pine, Douglas-fir (2)

MelissaBraxton commented 6 years ago

LGTM!

JaneZC commented 6 years ago

Amber -

Can you confirm that we have the correct tree species in Roosevelt/Arapaho and have included all the ones that should be included? Listed now is Engelmann Spruce, Douglas-fir, Subalpine Fir, Ponderosa Pine, Lodgepole Pine.

We didn't do the Word document review for this particular forest; and I don't think we need to as the intro paragraph will be the same as the other three forests and (right now) there are no new tree species so the descriptions of the trees should be all the same as the other forests as well. But, I wanted to be sure that we confirmed that we have the correct tree species in the content.

Thanks. :)

Jane

ASprinkle commented 6 years ago

Hello @JaneZC I just read your message (from 12 days ago...) when I view the site, I can only see three species, Engelmann Spruce, Douglas-fir, Subalpine Fir - I do not see Ponderosa or Lodgepole Pine. The descriptions for those species look good to me.

MelissaBraxton commented 6 years ago

+1 to AMber's comments.

The page is missing a horizontal rule between Englemann Spruce and Douglas-fir species info.