Closed RonaldPhilipsen closed 1 month ago
Hi, @RonaldPhilipsen How did you deployment EMQX operator? looks you use the ghcr.io
image, you should use docker hub image, it supported arm64: https://hub.docker.com/r/emqx/emqx-operator-controller/tags
Hi, @RonaldPhilipsen How did you deployment EMQX operator? looks you use the
ghcr.io
image, you should use docker hub image, it supported arm64: https://hub.docker.com/r/emqx/emqx-operator-controller/tags
Why are they different? Should it not be the same image in both registries?
Docker hub is frowned upon due to the pull limits imposed there, which the org members will not notice but most if not all others will. Please make sure the ghcr.io published images are also multi-arch or don't have them at all if you don't support using them.
Hi @Rory-Z, I´d have to concur with @samip5. Pull limits are annoying, and it shouldn´t be too much effort to also deploy the same images to both registries
@samip5 @RonaldPhilipsen Thanks for your feedback, let me add multi arch in ghcr.io
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. When running on a arm64-based k8s instance the image fails to pull
Describe the solution you'd like
Build the docker image for arm64
Describe alternatives you've considered
Migrating my cluster to X86, however this is going to be costly both in power and dollars
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.