Open maxieds opened 6 years ago
Hi @maxieds I never tried to communicate with the Chameleon in other ways than it is implemented currently. Personally, I only see little benefit from using APDUs. However, it would need major changes in the Firmware and if you really want to do this (we appreciate every contribution!) you should have a look at the functions in Terminal/Terminal.c and Terminal/CommandLine.c.
Hello. I have been tinkering with some USB code to control the Chameleon Mini boards (both revisions), and am interested in building up a non-trivial tag that is being emulated by the Chameleon Mini boards. By this I mean, that I want to be able to make directories, store files, key protect special files, etc., and all of that fun special jazz that can be done with your typical NFC tag by means of (usually) ISO APDU commands. Right now the only particularly easy tag properties to configure are UID-related.
I plugged my Chameleon RevG board into my favorite Linux, and issued the following command: $ lsusb -v 16d0:04b2
As a response I got back some interesting details like
In my android app (Chameleon Mini Live Debugger) I have always chosen to communicate with the Chameleon devices over serial USB (UART specification if you look up the USB libs for communication on Android. What I'm wondering is if all this extra output at the end of the above command could let me communicate in a different mode with the Chameleon? The end goal of this is again to talk to, say, a MIFARE_1K tag that the Chameleon board is currently emulating using standard APDU-formatted messages.
I would really, really be appreciative of anyone who can shed some light on this approach!! :)