Open gaborbernat opened 1 month ago
Discussion at https://github.com/encode/httpx/discussions/3091
Yep... does anyone want to look into switching our code docstring support to mkdocstrings
?
Odd that I was just about to raise this very issue after stumbling through @gaborbernat's latest docs, as I'm trying to link documentation for a downstream module of httpx.
An example of mkdocstrings
own configuration can be seen here:
https://github.com/mkdocstrings/mkdocstrings/blob/0.26.2/mkdocs.yml#L136-L163
WIP changes at feature/mkdocstrings. Some concessions will need to be made between matching in with current mkautodocs format, and the options exposed by mkdocstrings. Some improvements to actual docstrings within the Python code (part tracked by #3355) should be made to improve the generated docs.
@Stealthii let me know if you open a PR, I'll have some comments and suggestions 🙂
Any way we can generate an Intersphinx catalog one can use to automatically link to the documentation?
Something like this would work to patch it:
though unsure how to emphasize the URI 🤔