Closed kleschenko closed 6 months ago
Well... Then the goal of the previous PR is just ignored...
@Kludex I've just tested the snippet from the original issue https://github.com/encode/uvicorn/issues/1579 and it works as expected for me with this change
Does this makes sense @maxfischer2781 ?
I honestly don't know how the raise_signal
is supposed to affect subprocesses in the first place; there is no clear repro for #2289 so I cannot say what is the actual issue.
@Kludex I've created #2317 instead to fix the issues I could reproduce.
Summary
This change removes the
raise_signal
call which breaks default signal handling for subprocesses.Closes https://github.com/encode/uvicorn/issues/2289 (and possibly https://github.com/encode/uvicorn/issues/2294)
Checklist