[Request] a new tag for products : description/productDescription

[usta]

I think having a string tag called description/productDescription will nice to have so we can do something like this [1] or [2] , sure also we can easily use it within our api system The main idea is a short version of context will be in this tag [not more than a few lines]

example [1] :

example [2]:

[usta]

What do you think @captn3m0 @generalmimon @BiNZGi @hebbet @marcwrobel @adriens ?

[usta]

@hugovk

[captn3m0]

Since we already have a clear blockquote (>) as part of our contribution template, maybe we can just do this in Jekyll. I don't want to define large HTML/markdown blobs in the front-matter. The only exception so far is LTSLabel where we stuff a abbr tag, but description feels incorrect.

Seeing if this can be done in liquid.

[usta]

you are just looking for the frontend side , this will also allow users to get product information though api it will be nice to used in cli applications that show product information which also needs it though api

[captn3m0]

The code I wrote for #2069 can also be used for the API usecase. Our convention of using a quote for the product description works well here - and it keeps our contributions simpler (Writing markdown inside YAML isn't always easy).

Long-term, I want to use as little Liquid as possible, by doing all of the logic in Ruby, and presenting a simple data model to both the HTML template, and the API layout.

[marcwrobel]

Nice addition @usta / @captn3m0 :+1: !

Product pages without a logo look a little bit strange. Maybe we should add a default logo or remove it entirely in that case ?

[usta]

@marcwrobel @captn3m0 we can use [prepare same or similar icon for simpleicons] for NA icons

[marcwrobel]

I doubt simpleicons will accept it, but we could try.

[captn3m0]

We can add it directly in our template as well.

[marcwrobel]

Yep, I was more thinking about that.

I fear choosing a logo for such product will be difficult (like it is for #978): it must be clear that this is not the product logo. So I wonder if it would not be simpler to just drop it for those pages (=> no more space on the left of the description).

[usta]

i think that logo which i shown above perfect for all applications