Closed adriens closed 11 months ago
Do we all agree on the anomalies ?
openjdk-builds-from-oracle - no LTS, see https://endoflife.date/openjdk-builds-from-oracle
:fearful: :hankey:
ibm-semeru-runtime - all release are LTS, so the LTS concept does not work there, see https://endoflife.date/ibm-semeru-runtime
:sunglasses: :muscle:
amazon-corretto - Fixed in https://github.com/endoflife-date/endoflife.date/pull/3666
:pray:
graalvm - I am not aware of LTS versions of GraalVM, but feel free to provide some information / a PR
I'm working on it :runner:
Current status :
https://github.com/oracle/graal/blob/master/SECURITY.md
Please refer to the GraalVM Security Guide for security related topics such as how to support trusted and less trusted code execution
:crossed_fingers:
I consider the issue fixed and will port feedback from Oracle if there are some :crossed_fingers:
:grey_question: About
We have integrated Java EOLs to our internal lifecycle management system and we noticed that some Java distro do not properl mention
LTS
:point_right: So I have decided to have a closer look at all available Java runtimes and see if LTS are properly documented.
:dart: Goal
The purpose of this issue it to ensure we are properly reporting
LTS
on endoflife.date for all java distributions (and there are a lot), especially in a period where Java 21 (LTS
) has landed.For example openjdk should be fixed as a benefit of this issue:
:information_source:
Below the global status of java
LTS
:eol_id
LTS
status:heavy_check_mark: Actions
LTS
foropenjdk-builds-from-oracle
LTS
forredhat-build-of-openjdk
LTS
forgraalvm
LTS
foribm-semeru-runtime
LTS
foramazon-corretto
:bookmark_tabs: Related resources