Closed michaelfig closed 3 years ago
maintaining harden separately? care to elaborate on why?
maintaining harden separately? care to elaborate on why?
I'm not looking for reviews yet. :wink:
But to elaborate, I'm thinking that harden may move from SES to Jessie (from OS to kernel), and then SES can depend on some of the Jessie machinery. I haven't fully justified this yet, but further discussion will be had before attempting to land this.
Given that Jessie is a separate monorepo and local-Jessie is a subset of SES, it makes sense that anything common to both local-Jessie and SES, like harden
, be in Jessie and depended upon by SES. I think this would be a good move.
We'll take this in smaller pieces.
Refs #47
Forms a basis for the new
lib-jessie
library.