Closed erights closed 9 months ago
Got it wrong. Back to draft for the moment.
Fixed. I followed exactly your original suggestion. My attempted improvement was just confused.
Ready for review again. Btw, I squashed which seems harmless for this review.
closes: #XXXX refs: #1969
Description
At https://github.com/endojs/endo/pull/1969#pullrequestreview-1823695473 @mhofman suggests:
Because it is so separate, I made it into a this separate PR.
At https://github.com/endojs/endo/pull/1969#discussion_r1453556803 @mhofman suggests better code for that part of #1969. This PR uses that suggestion.
Security Considerations
none
Scaling Considerations
none
Documentation Considerations
none
Testing Considerations
none
Upgrade Considerations
none