Add 95% CI error bars to CE and CW examples (Sourcery refactored)

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Pull Request #14 refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the error_bars branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/error_bars
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.08%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	25.80 😞	25.79 😞	-0.01 👍
Method Length	381.40 ⛔	380.60 ⛔	-0.80 👍
Working memory	20.84 ⛔	20.83 ⛔	-0.01 👍
Quality	24.58% ⛔	24.66% ⛔	0.08% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	395	398	3

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
examples/merrill_1984_fig_2c_2d.py	7.09% ⛔	7.09% ⛔	0.00%
examples/merrill_1984_table_1_fig_1.py	13.13% ⛔	13.13% ⛔	0.00%
examples/wikipedia_condorcet_paradox_likelihood.py	69.29% 🙂	69.29% 🙂	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (c93a525) 97.40% compared to head (9c93897) 97.40%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## error_bars #19 +/- ## =========================================== Coverage 97.40% 97.40% =========================================== Files 18 18 Lines 463 463 =========================================== Hits 451 451 Misses 12 12 ``` Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None)

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.