Closed lazyatom closed 11 years ago
I am wondering if we should move to :theme
but leave :use_theme
around for backwards compatibility. The docs would only mention :theme
. We can then remove :use_theme
at a later time when appropriate. I see no semantic issues with :theme => true
using the built-in theme.
Sounds good to me.
Thinking about this some more, maybe we should go with something like :layout
as the new name. Potentially we could also have options[:layout] = 'postmarkdown'
as a replacement for options[:use_theme] = true
.
:layout
sounds good to me.
I've reworked the commit in line with suggestions above.
Looking good. Thanks for the pull request.
FYI I have deprecated the :use_theme
option as a part of this merge.
This addition is now available in 0.0.5.
In an application, I might want to use an existing layout which isn't called
application
orpostmarkdown
.