Closed froth closed 3 years ago
I have updated actor from 2.5.x to 2.6.x and now quartz actor doesn't have support for typed-actor so I wouldn't be able to use quartz or typed actor :-(
@froth @ngu04 I've opened a Pull Request, check it out!
Hey guys, I'm already using in production. So, if you want to use before @enragedginger review PR #102
private val akkaQuartzVersion = "1.9.0-akka-2.6.x"
libraryDependencies += "com.enragedginger" %% "akka-quartz-scheduler" % akkaQuartzVersion
resolvers += "Bintray".at("https://dl.bintray.com/justa/maven/")```
The new release has been cut for this and is available on maven central.
@enragedginger why Travis is build not passing
?
The QuartzSchedulerFunctionalSpec
tests are flaky and have been that way for awhile now. If I run the whole test suite with sbt test
two of the tests in that class fail. But just running the QuartzSchedulerFunctionalSpec
tests alone results in success. If you could find a way to make them succeed 100% of the time, that'd be great.
The
QuartzSchedulerFunctionalSpec
tests are flaky and have been that way for awhile now. If I run the whole test suite withsbt test
two of the tests in that class fail. But just running theQuartzSchedulerFunctionalSpec
tests alone results in success. If you could find a way to make them succeed 100% of the time, that'd be great.
@enragedginger figure out that if we run the test method by your self (only the method) it works. I think we have some concurrency problem in the test with Typed Actors. Can you help me to how to fix it?
@enragedginger it was my mistake! Figure out that I´ve other test has a bug that occours in some cenarios...
ALL FIXED AT PR #103
As the typed akka api is now the default in the akka project it would be nice if akka-quartz-scheduler would support it.
For example all api's that currently have the current format:
should have an additional typed implemention of the form
However it would require a typed implementation of SimpleActorMessageJob I think. My first thought for the content of the jobDataMap would be:
However I am currently not sure what to do with MessageRequireFireTime.