Closed peterdesmet closed 7 years ago
We will include data from the 19/9 to the 9/10, so 20 days. For the analysis I think we will mostly be working with nightly means per station. What do you think, does it make sense to do that for the visualization as well? Or will that be too coarse?
Nightly means will probably be a bit too coarse for the visualization, especially the animated flow viz (will look "jumpy"). If we use per hour, we'll get 24 hours 20 days = 480 steps, which is a bit fewer than what we have for the case study: 24 hours 3 per hour (20 min) * 7 days = 504 steps. I'll try that and we can adapt to something that works.
20 days... if I can count right, that is 19/9 inclusive and 9/10 exclusive, right?
It should be 19/9 AND 9/10 inclusive, so 21 days actually.
I only got to make some rough, undocumented code to aggregate, but it is by the hour. Closing this issue.
How do we want to aggregate across time? I guess it depends on which aggregation still makes sense to see the details, but also allows to navigate through the whole flyway time series (which is days? weeks?). Does an aggregation on
hour
(as shown below) make sense?