Closed jlsjonas closed 5 years ago
Of course, that was on of the reasons for rewriting the ui as renderless.
If you have the time do a PR, add a renderless folder near bulma and export everything from core.
If not I will take care of it in the near future.
Mimicking the folder structure or not? I overrode the module using above snippet under renderless but it gets messy quite quickly
The thing is that without mimicking the folder structure in time we could have a problem of name conflicts. But we can make a breaking change if this is the case at that point.
So better have everything at one level.
Why not avoid future naming conflicts & provide a clearer structure from the get-go?
I'd recommend to at least separate components & layout; waiting on your 👍 to mold it into a PR.
ok then, use the existing folder structure
Any updates on this?
Lost track of this one, will look for it this week.
(can't seem to assign myself btw)
merged
This is a feature request.
Prerequisites
Description
Expose renderless UI components for overriding in own (VCS-able) code.
This would limit patches to rewriting the import in templates (or the templates themselves) instead of heaving potentially 100's of lines to be patched using patch-package for generic files
renderless snippet:
I'd recommend splitting the file up in sections for a cleaner structure (i.e.
renderless/components
, ...)