revansx
commented
2 years ago I agree and think that anyone interested in contributing to meza in order to achieve Debian support should be able to pull a lot of what is needed from Freephile's 34.x "qb" fork of meza. That said, we should always seek to place the centos/rhel-centric content in dedicated centos/rhel-dedicated task files so that the main tasks contain the distro-check logic. Does that make sense?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:08 PM James Montalvo @.***> wrote:
Several years ago there were many requests for Meza to work on Debian. I put in a fair amount of work getting it working, and then got minimal further interest.
Meza does a lot. Without significant contribution from others I don't think it's sustainable to support multiple OSes. My inclination is to drop support for Debian.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/enterprisemediawiki/meza/issues/1300, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH2UQVE5OABYXJW7VZ2OPS3UMGHFTANCNFSM5IC3KOXQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
Several years ago there were many requests for Meza to work on Debian. I put in a fair amount of work getting it working, and then got minimal further interest.
Meza does a lot. Without significant contribution from others I don't think it's sustainable to support multiple OSes. My inclination is to drop support for Debian.