Open dimo414 opened 1 year ago
@phlax I don't know the answer to these, but any chance you can poke around on maintainers/dev for answers and help clean up the docs?
happy to update/review docs
i guess the first thing is confirming validity of these statements
is expected to be the successor to the gRPC bridge filter.
This seems to imply that a) the GrpcWeb filter is not production-ready yet and b) the grpc_http1_bridge filter should be used in the meantime.
cc @jose @mattklein123 @zuercher as related code owners
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged "help wanted" or "no stalebot" or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Bump
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged "help wanted" or "no stalebot" or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Can we please not close this issue as stale just because it's not being acted on?
https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/v1.27.0/intro/arch_overview/other_protocols/grpc says:
This seems to imply that a) the
GrpcWeb
filter is not production-ready yet and b) thegrpc_http1_bridge
filter should be used in the meantime.A number of external examples, notably grpc/grpc-web use the
GrpcWeb
filter, suggesting that it is production ready.It would be helpful if the Envoy documentation could: