Closed zhaohuabing closed 3 weeks ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 65.98%. Comparing base (
14830c7
) to head (f9a6381
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Apart from passing the conformance test, how does the end user benefit from this change ?
Apart from passing the conformance test, how does the end user benefit from this change ?
No, but we could replace the existing gateway.envoyproxy.io/owning-gateway-name
with this one in the next release.
I suggest waiting until https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/issues/3366 is resolved which in indirectly related to the name of the label
Implement the Gateway name label pfart of GEP-1762: In Cluster Gateway Deployments
This PR only covers the gateway name label requirement in the GEP-1762.
Please note that this label has not been added to the generated resources of the merged gateway.
Implement: https://github.com/envoyproxy/gateway/issues/4330