Open probinso opened 2 years ago
I was able to confirm that NOTIFICATION_EMAIL_ADDRESS
does not overload the email address, by retrieving the order email from my account email.
I was informed that there might be a .SAFE
standards compliance reason to return a .zip
instead of a .tar.gz
. That makes sense, and would mean that packagingFormat
is only an issue with documentation.
It would still be nice to overload the notified email if that is possible.
Any news on this overloading of email bug? Is the backend code open source as well for this?
@probinso, EODMS support for packagingFormat
is being looked at by our vendor. It is planned to be fixed in an upcoming release of EODMS.
When I place an order and specify the
packagingFormat
as described in the documentation, the parameter is ignored. I Also never received an email for the order when overloading the response destination withNOTIFICATION_EMAIL_ADDRESS