search

eoglethorpe / deep

Data Entry and Extraction Platform
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
8 stars 2 forks source link

Assessment registry - additional fields required #470

Closed patricechataigner closed 7 years ago

patricechataigner commented 7 years ago

Please look into the following word document and add the fields in red to the current list of fields available in the assessment registry tagging screen.

cheers and hope you got back safe! new fields assessment registry.docx

bibekdahal commented 7 years ago

What will be options for the fields: crisis type, donors, coordination and sector?

Using #462 for options for unit of analysis and unit of reporting.

patricechataigner commented 7 years ago

Crisis types: Reuse the crisis list already available in the DEEP. Make the field single choice

Donors: Keep Field blank, one day we will have an entity panel and this will be easier.

Coordination: Three option, single choice: Uncoordinated, Harmonized or Joint

Sectors: This should be automatically calculated based on the number of sector selected below. So this is an automatic field.

All m ybest,

Patrice Chataigner Senior Analyst Email pc@acaps.orgmailto:pc@acaps.org Direct +41 22 338 15 97 Mobile + 41 792 358 174 Skype: pchataigner Website www.acaps.org

23, Avenue de France CH-1202 Geneva 5th Floor

From: Bibek Dahal [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Sunday, August 6, 2017 7:06 AM To: eoglethorpe/deep deep@noreply.github.com Cc: Patrice Chataigner pc@acaps.org; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [eoglethorpe/deep] Assessment registry - additional fields required (#470)

What will be options for the fields: crisis type, donors, coordination and sector?

Using #462https://github.com/eoglethorpe/deep/issues/462 for options for unit of analysis and unit of reporting.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/eoglethorpe/deep/issues/470#issuecomment-320486055, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APQWqtZsgEZFXKtcb41zZpyrtgF2KQs2ks5sVUmagaJpZM4OspI9.

bibekdahal commented 7 years ago

So is the crisis type same as disaster type used in weekly reports ?

For sectors, is it the total number of sectors filled or is it it's percentage? Or, is there some other specific formula?

Thanks.

patricechataigner commented 7 years ago

Yes same crisis type as disaster type.

Total number of sectors filled. A simple count is ok, IF WASH food and health are selected, then the number should be 3.

Cheers!

Patrice Chataigner Senior Analyst Email pc@acaps.orgmailto:pc@acaps.org Direct +41 22 338 15 97 Mobile + 41 792 358 174 Skype: pchataigner Website www.acaps.org

23, Avenue de France CH-1202 Geneva 5th Floor

From: Bibek Dahal [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 6:18 PM To: eoglethorpe/deep deep@noreply.github.com Cc: Patrice Chataigner pc@acaps.org; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [eoglethorpe/deep] Assessment registry - additional fields required (#470)

So is the crisis type same as disaster type used in weekly reports ?

For sectors, is it the total number of sectors filled or is it it's percentage? Or, is there some other specific formula?

Thanks.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/eoglethorpe/deep/issues/470#issuecomment-320709588, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APQWqhjPY5XaERFhvoWmFy262VQohG4Mks5sVzihgaJpZM4OspI9.