In the "Device overview" table, we should indicate hosts that are unreachable by name. Perhaps even coloring them in any "load balancer" column on the various tables.
We MAY want to consider changing all adcLinks to those devices to use the IP/name used in the xml config file instead of an apparently unreachable hostname as reported by the load balancer. The problem with that, is if the xml references 10.1.2.3 and the certificate is issued to main.example.com using a link to https://10.1.2.3/whatever would generate a certificate error.
Personally, I use hostnames and NOT ips in my xml config and I recommend others do the same. :smile:
In the "Device overview" table, we should indicate hosts that are unreachable by name. Perhaps even coloring them in any "load balancer" column on the various tables.
We MAY want to consider changing all adcLinks to those devices to use the IP/name used in the xml config file instead of an apparently unreachable hostname as reported by the load balancer. The problem with that, is if the xml references 10.1.2.3 and the certificate is issued to main.example.com using a link to https://10.1.2.3/whatever would generate a certificate error.
Personally, I use hostnames and NOT ips in my xml config and I recommend others do the same. :smile: