epakai / synergy-debian

Synergy packaging for Debian
Other
4 stars 2 forks source link

[504654] xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion ((int) ((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0) failed. #1

Closed epakai closed 7 years ago

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: a221c0100811051425h48b16080h6f715bcfb0cfa1a8@mail.gmail.com BTS author: "Nathan Schulte" reklipz@gmail.com

Subject: Synergy bug #495498 still exists in version 1.3.1-5 Followup-For: Bug #382063 Package: synergy Version: 1.3.1-5

I'm still having troubles with this bug.

My setup for synergy is as follows:

Windows XP SP3 32bit server on left Debian lenny amd64 client on right

I am running OpenSSH on the windows box, and and connecting via an ssh tunnel on the debian box.

$ synergyc --debug INFO -f localhost INFO: synergyc.cpp,716: Synergy client 1.3.1 on Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64

1 SMP Thu Oct 9 14:16:53 UTC 2008 x86_64

NOTE: synergyc.cpp,330: started client NOTE: synergyc.cpp,247: connected to server INFO: CScreen.cpp,98: entering screen

.. removed for clarity ...

INFO: CScreen.cpp,116: leaving screen INFO: CScreen.cpp,98: entering screen synergyc: ../../src/xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int) ((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed. Aborted

This is my first time filing a bug report, so if I messed up anywhere, my apologies.

If there is anything else I can provide, let me know.

-Nate

-- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages synergy depends on: ii libc6 2.7-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.3.2-1 GCC support library ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.3.2-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxinerama1 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxtst6 2:1.0.3-1 X11 Testing -- Resource extension

synergy recommends no packages.

synergy suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: 20090324122741.GK3622@planet.jerri.home BTS author: Gerhard Siegesmund jerri@jerri.de

Hello all

There seems to be a patch on the following link, that fixes the bug. On my servers with the patch applied the synergyc runs without problem.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synergy/+bug/299152

Greetings

-- cu --== Jerri ==-- Homepage: http://www.jerri.de/ ICQ: 54160208 Public PGP Key: http://www.jerri.de/jerris_public_key.asc

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: 1258654572-3142-bts-olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu BTS author: Olivier Berger olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu

retitle 504654 xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion ((int) ((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0) failed.

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: 5003010E.2010604@debian.org BTS author: Jeff Licquia licquia@debian.org

I'm fairly certain this fix has made it into upstream. Could you try with either 1.3.8-2 from unstable or the 1.4.x version in experimental?

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: 50223787.4000003@gmail.com BTS author: Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com

submitter 504654 Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: 50225A96.1080704@gmail.com BTS author: Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com

I wasn't subscribed to this bug report, so I didn't see the updates. I no longer have this specific setup, so I cannot verify that I still receive the error. I have a setup available at work that I can try to reproduce this error, and if so, I will test with the newer releases of synergy from experimental, etc. I may even take the time to install Debian Lenny if I can't reproduce it with Squeeze, for the sake of closing the bug report. If not, I would mark it unreproducible and/or call it fixed and/or close the bug.

-- Nate

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: CALjcMPV1mUuuC5ZABUU21WGarDd=z9=xw+r23gqa2NJV=mh2sQ@mail.gmail.com BTS author: Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com

tags 504654 + unreproducible quit

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com wrote:

I wasn't subscribed to this bug report, so I didn't see the updates. I no longer have this specific setup, so I cannot verify that I still receive the error. I have a setup available at work that I can try to reproduce this error, and if so, I will test with the newer releases of synergy from experimental, etc. I may even take the time to install Debian Lenny if I can't reproduce it with Squeeze, for the sake of closing the bug report. If not, I would mark it unreproducible and/or call it fixed and/or close the bug.

I've done the above, trying to recreate the setup as best I could. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to use Debian Lenny for the test, but presumably Debian Squeeze has the same version of the Synergy client as my original report had. I am unable to reproduce this bug; perhaps it's due to a different X configuration, I don't know.

Anyway, I've marked the bug as unreproducible. Feel free to close the report, I'm fairly confident it's been fixed, as you state.

-- Nate

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msgid: <CALjcMPX+_Vm+kAaJzywv8gLKb=jKL6DV1U_E9NqZLHzGm7JPA@mail.gmail.com> BTS author: Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com

tags 504654 + unreproducible quit

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com wrote:

I wasn't subscribed to this bug report, so I didn't see the updates. I no longer have this specific setup, so I cannot verify that I still receive the error. I have a setup available at work that I can try to reproduce this error, and if so, I will test with the newer releases of synergy from experimental, etc. I may even take the time to install Debian Lenny if I can't reproduce it with Squeeze, for the sake of closing the bug report. If not, I would mark it unreproducible and/or call it fixed and/or close the bug.

I've done the above, trying to recreate the setup as best I could. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to use Debian Lenny for the test, but presumably Debian Squeeze has the same version of the Synergy client as my original report had. I am unable to reproduce this bug; perhaps it's due to a different X configuration, I don't know.

Anyway, I've marked the bug as unreproducible. Feel free to close the report, I'm fairly confident it's been fixed, as you state.

-- Nate

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: 503A6147.4060800@debian.org BTS author: Jeff Licquia licquia@debian.org

On 08/08/2012 08:24 AM, Nathan Schulte wrote:

I wasn't subscribed to this bug report, so I didn't see the updates. I no longer have this specific setup, so I cannot verify that I still receive the error. I have a setup available at work that I can try to reproduce this error, and if so, I will test with the newer releases of synergy from experimental, etc. I may even take the time to install Debian Lenny if I can't reproduce it with Squeeze, for the sake of closing the bug report. If not, I would mark it unreproducible and/or call it fixed and/or close the bug.

Have you had a chance to try this out?

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: CAO78Khp615TFuJV-hsHrsHUYuYueAqDvundwaoxQWH3Z8-9G0Q@mail.gmail.com BTS author: Nathan Schulte nmschulte@gmail.com

On Aug 26, 2012 12:57 PM, "Jeff Licquia" <licquia licquia@debian.org@licquia@debian.org debian.org licquia@debian.org> wrote:

Have you had a chance to try this out?

I have. Check out my reply on the bug report, just prior to yours.

-- Nate

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: 5095A114.5090204@debian.org BTS author: Jeff Licquia licquia@debian.org

On 10/02/2012 08:34 AM, Nathan Schulte wrote:

On Aug 26, 2012 12:57 PM, "Jeff Licquia" <licquia mailto:licquia@debian.org@ mailto:licquia@debian.orgdebian.org mailto:licquia@debian.org> wrote:

Have you had a chance to try this out?

I have. Check out my reply on the bug report, just prior to yours.

Thanks for the follow-up; I must have missed your reply when you sent it before.

I'm going to follow your suggestion and mark the bug closed. If you have the problem again, definitely reopen the bug or file a new one.

epakai commented 7 years ago

BTS_msg_id: Bug archived. BTS author: Debbugs Internal Request owner@bugs.debian.org

A New Hope

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away

something happened.

#

Magically this resulted in the following

action being taken, but this fake control

message doesn't tell you why it happened

#

The action:

Bug archived.

thanks

This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs

administrator