Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Why do you think this is a query from Replicator? It doesn't look like it's
coming from Replicator. Is there a corresponding entry in THL? If so, please
attach `./thl list -seqno X` output of this query.
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 12 Feb 2013 at 12:22
We are using a unique username for replicator, and from the output of mysql
processlist it's the user who was running it.
After some investigation, I think replicator was probably doing some data
verification before it executes the row-based binlog SQL. By the way, we are
using mixed binlog format on all our servers.
Here is the output form thl list:
2013-02-12 20:48:32,545 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Using directory
'/opt/tungsten/fanin/thl/bravo/' for replicator logs
2013-02-12 20:48:32,549 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Checksums enabled for
log records: true
2013-02-12 20:48:32,565 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Using read-only log
connection
2013-02-12 20:48:32,577 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Loaded event serializer
class: com.continuent.tungsten.replicator.thl.serializer.ProtobufSerializer
2013-02-12 20:48:32,592 [ - main] INFO thl.log.LogIndex Building file index on
log directory: /opt/tungsten/fanin/thl/bravo
2013-02-12 20:48:32,709 [ - main] INFO thl.log.LogIndex Constructed index;
total log files added=3
2013-02-12 20:48:32,710 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Validating last log
file: /opt/tungsten/fanin/thl/bravo/thl.data.0000000003
2013-02-12 20:48:33,714 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Setting up log flush
policy: fsyncIntervalMillis=0 fsyncOnFlush=false
2013-02-12 20:48:33,761 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Idle log connection
timeout: 28800000ms
2013-02-12 20:48:33,761 [ - main] INFO thl.log.DiskLog Log preparation is
complete
SEQ# = 72420 / FRAG# = 0 (last frag)
- TIME = 2013-02-12 02:05:08.0
- EPOCH# = 0
- EVENTID = mysql-bin.000003:0000000203747614;0
- SOURCEID = SOME_SERVER
- METADATA = [mysql_server_id=2;service=bravo;shard=livecrm]
- TYPE = com.continuent.tungsten.replicator.event.ReplDBMSEvent
- SQL(0) =
- ACTION = UPDATE
- SCHEMA = livecrm
- TABLE = logs
- ROW# = 0
- COL(1: ) = 70665
- COL(2: ) = 2013-02-11 23:30:31.0
- COL(3: ) = [B@605036e8
- COL(4: ) = [B@3244eabe
- COL(5: ) = 2013-02-12 02:05:08.0
- COL(6: ) = [B@4a8f79ba
- KEY(1: ) = 70665
- KEY(2: ) = 2013-02-11 23:30:31.0
- KEY(3: ) = [B@1180c894
- KEY(4: ) = [B@1df07586
- KEY(5: ) = 2013-02-12 01:59:57.0
- KEY(6: ) = [B@15b3bfc5
Original comment by stanley....@ityin.net
on 12 Feb 2013 at 8:44
Might be (a) JDBC driver asking metadata from MySQL or (b) MySQL itself for
performance statistics or (c) a bug in MySQL 5.6. Have you tried this on 5.5?
Please provide:
* Exact MySQL 5.6 version,
* static-bravo.properties file (remove passwords if they are sensitive),
* tungsten-installer call used to set this slave up,
* EXPLAIN output.
P.S. I renamed this issue a bit.
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 13 Feb 2013 at 6:07
No, I didn't try on 5.5. It was running on 5.1, but I didn't notice the SQL
because we don't have any products using the DB at that time.
* I am using MySQL 5.6.10 on RedHat Enterprise Linux 6.3 (64bit) for the fan-in
slave, and using MySQL 5.1.16 on CentOS 6.3(64bit) for bravo master.
* Please find the attached static-bravo.properties
* Here is the tungsten-installer calles:
./tools/tungsten-installer -a --master-slave --master-host=<MASTER_SERVER>
--datasource-port=3306 --datasource-user=<USERNAME>
--datasource-password=<PASSWORD> --datasource-log-directory=/var/lib/mysql
--service-name=bravo --net-ssh-option=port=<PORT>
--svc-extractor-filters=replicate
--property=replicator.filter.replicate.ignore=test.*,mysql.*,information_schema.
*,performance_schema.* --property=replicator.auto_enable=false
--home-directory=/opt/tungsten/fanin --cluster-hosts=<MASTER_SERVER>
/opt/tungsten/fanin/tungsten/tools/configure-service --host=<SLAVE_SERVER>
--advanced -C -q --local-service-name=echo --role=slave --service-type=remote
--log-slave-updates=true --datasource=<DATA_SOURCE>
--property=replicator.auto_enable=false --master-thl-host=<MASTER_SERVER>
--svc-start bravo
* Which output do you want me to explain?
Original comment by stanley....@ityin.net
on 13 Feb 2013 at 9:01
Attachments:
in case you need it, the following is snippet from mysqlbinlog command line.
What I don't understand is that the SQL from thl is actually right above the
position stated in thl list log: mysql-bin.000003:0000000203747614
# at 203747249
# at 203747306
#130212 2:05:08 server id 2 end_log_pos 203747306 Table_map:
`livecrm`.`logs` mapped to number 177934
#130212 2:05:08 server id 2 end_log_pos 203747534 Update_rows: table id
177934 flags: STMT_END_F
BINLOG '
VKMZURMCAAAAOQAAAOrvJAwAAA63AgAAAAEAB2xpdmVjcm0ABGxvZ3MABggMDw8MDwYUADcANwAA
VKMZURgCAAAA5AAAAM7wJAwAAA63AgAAAAEABv//wAkUAQAAAAAAB/0W7k4SAAAOMTI0LjE2OS4x
NTYuNDMfYW5kcmV3QGZvcm1hbHdlYXJleHByZXNzLmNvbS5hdVXvIu5OEgAAGmYzNzVvazNsYmE2
OTZlNDE1OTloZDk5N2k2wAkUAQAAAAAAB/0W7k4SAAAOMTI0LjE2OS4xNTYuNDMfYW5kcmV3QGZv
cm1hbHdlYXJleHByZXNzLmNvbS5hdRwBI+5OEgAAGmYzNzVvazNsYmE2OTZlNDE1OTloZDk5N2k2
'/*!*/;
### UPDATE livecrm.logs
### WHERE
### @1=70665 /* LONGINT meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @2=2013-02-11 23:30:31 /* DATETIME meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @3='124.169.156.43' /* VARSTRING(20) meta=20 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @4='andrew@formalwearexpress.com.au' /* VARSTRING(55) meta=55 nullable=0
is_null=0 */
### @5=2013-02-12 01:59:57 /* DATETIME meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @6='f375ok3lba696e41599hd997i6' /* VARSTRING(55) meta=55 nullable=0
is_null=0 */
### SET
### @1=70665 /* LONGINT meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @2=2013-02-11 23:30:31 /* DATETIME meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @3='124.169.156.43' /* VARSTRING(20) meta=20 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @4='andrew@formalwearexpress.com.au' /* VARSTRING(55) meta=55 nullable=0
is_null=0 */
### @5=2013-02-12 02:05:08 /* DATETIME meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
### @6='f375ok3lba696e41599hd997i6' /* VARSTRING(55) meta=55 nullable=0
is_null=0 */
# at 203747534
#130212 2:05:08 server id 2 end_log_pos 203747614 Query
thread_id=663008 exec_time=0 error_code=0
Original comment by stanley....@ityin.net
on 14 Feb 2013 at 2:23
This query is generated by the JDBC driver. We will investigate if it is
possible to get information with a less heavy query
Original comment by g.maxia
on 14 Feb 2013 at 10:04
We'll use 2.1.0 instead of 2.0.8, hence moving the issues.
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 27 Mar 2013 at 3:14
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 14 Jun 2013 at 6:56
Original comment by g.maxia
on 18 Jun 2013 at 8:45
Moving to 2.1.2
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 21 Aug 2013 at 12:59
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 26 Aug 2013 at 1:54
There won't be a 2.1.3.
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 17 Sep 2013 at 10:13
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 23 Dec 2013 at 9:51
postponing
Original comment by stephane...@continuent.com
on 30 Jan 2014 at 9:21
Original comment by stephane...@continuent.com
on 30 Jan 2014 at 9:22
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 10 Sep 2014 at 12:51
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 19 Dec 2014 at 7:03
Original comment by linas.vi...@continuent.com
on 19 Jan 2015 at 2:18
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
stanley....@ityin.net
on 11 Feb 2013 at 11:01