Closed eeberhard closed 2 years ago
this is potentially a breaking change no?
this is potentially a breaking change no?
Potentially, yes, though as mentioned in #308, it should be rare for someone to explicitly use keyword arguments for positional arguments in their Python. The ABI technically is unchanged.
This is not an urgent PR so we can also let it be until the next major release.
Potentially, yes, though as mentioned in #308, it should be rare for someone to explicitly use keyword arguments for positional arguments in their Python.
I agree yes, it's very unlikely.
We shouldn't wait for that I would say.
Should I finish this PR?
Should I finish this PR?
I think we can go ahead with the changes here since I found another potential breaking change in another feature I want to implement. I think it's just the changelog and such so I will update those
To make nomenclature more consistent (see also https://github.com/epfl-lasa/modulo/pull/123), all
frame_name
parameters and attributes have been renamed toframe
. This PR also address #308 and makes the argument names in the python bindings match the nomenclature in the C++ class.