Closed ammaraziz closed 1 year ago
Hi @ammaraziz,
Thanks for this suggestion. I agree that this will be a useful addition, if it doesn't make it to the current incarnation of wf-artic
we will ensure masking reasons are enumerated in the replacement workflow.
Thanks
Matt
Is your feature related to a problem?
When looking at positions in the consensus with Ns, it's useful to understand it has been masked/missing when genome coverage is high. The failed vcf contains very useful information.
Describe the solution you'd like
Similar to the
.pass.named.vcf.gz
output generated, please add a.fail.named.vcf.gz
. Theall_variants.vcf.gz
output needs to contain the failed variants. Or ideally create two separate outputsall_failed_variants.vcf.gz
andall_pass_variants.vcf.gz
Describe alternatives you've considered
Currently I search the
work
folder output by nextflow, however this is really difficult to search through as the outputs are in random folders.Additional context
No response