Closed lukashellmann closed 2 months ago
Hi, thanks for pointing this out. We will investigate this difference and see if we need to amend the report plot.
Hi, sorry we have not managed to look in to this yet - We hope to look at it soon.
Hi, thanks for taking the time!
Have identified the issue, we have a different significance level set for each of the plot. Will update in the next release
Sorry for the delay, this will be updated soon.
This is fixed in the prerelease
Operating System
Windows 10
Other Linux
debian 12
Workflow Version
0.4.1
Workflow Execution
EPI2ME Desktop application
EPI2ME Version
No response
CLI command run
No response
Workflow Execution - CLI Execution Profile
None
What happened?
Hi,
the MA plot in the report is different from the one in the de_analysis folder:
wf-transcriptomes-report.html![bokeh_plot](https://github.com/epi2me-labs/wf-transcriptomes/assets/124354526/6df42424-493a-4ded-98b7-86961965cd18)
de_analysis/results_dge.pdf![grafik](https://github.com/epi2me-labs/wf-transcriptomes/assets/124354526/b46bb2ea-8599-4052-a681-3712f70bc36f)
The number of significant genes should be correct in the pdf file, according to the numbers in the table. The plot in the report.html does not seem to change at all for different data/analysis.
Best Lukas
Relevant log output
Application activity log entry
No response