Closed KuktaeKim closed 2 years ago
Either field_1.value
or value.field_1
could be encountered in different situations. eg. field_1.value
in a QSRV group where field_1
is a group member with a value
sub-field. Or value.field_1
may be one column in a NTTable.
The choice of example is largely arbitrary, and is intended to convey the idea that any (sub)field, or fields, can be set this way.
I'm inclined to keep the value.field_1
ordering as a hint that various .value
are not special. A client may attempt to write any field. (Of course most servers don't accept writes to every field...)
That makes sense. Thank you for your explanation!
In client.rst file,
There is a section that explains pvget and pvput in python using P4P as below:
Get and Put operations can be performed on single PVs or a list of PVs. ::
For the multiple fields, field_1.value -> value.field_1 and field_2.value -> value.field_2