Closed GDYendell closed 8 months ago
The conversion was defaulting to use name + _RBV for read_pv, which is now not correct.
name
read_pv
This fix makes SettingPair pass in the read_record so that the pv comes from the template.
SettingPair
read_record
It would probably be possible to refactor these classes so that more fields are required and checks for None can be removed.
None
@gilesknap apologies you may need to check the convert you did for motor with this latest version. If you had SignalRWs the read_pvs will be wrong.
SignalRW
The conversion was defaulting to use
name
+ _RBV forread_pv
, which is now not correct.This fix makes
SettingPair
pass in theread_record
so that the pv comes from the template.It would probably be possible to refactor these classes so that more fields are required and checks for
None
can be removed.