Closed keenanlang closed 7 years ago
Is the extension .iocsh
already in common use? I would prefer .cmd
if you're only just starting out, since it matches the long-standing st.cmd
filenames that we've always used.
Is that sufficient to differentiate it from the existing shell script we use now? Or is it really the same shell?
From Keenan's examples in this commit it looks like the same shell, but I don't know for sure what you guys have been doing. The iocsh language was designed to be as closely compatible with the VxWorks shell as Eric could reasonably make it.
.iocsh has been used by both Tim Mooney and Mark Rivers to denote command files that must be interpreted by iocsh rather than vxWorks; usually to get around line-length limits.
@keenanlang Ok, that sounds like a good-enough reason!
Added iocsh files for all support that require more than just a database.