Closed hamishgibbs closed 4 years ago
I think this doesn't do what is expected as dplyr depends on tibble for this functionality? Happy to be wrong
You are right, dplyr
depends on tibble
for tibble::tibble
and tibble::as_tibble
. Is it better to rely on dplyr to have tibble as a dependency?
So that we do not import tibble in this package when it is already a dependency of dplyr?
Or does that not make too much difference?
It doesn't really make a difference our deps just go dplyr
-> tibble
rather than straight to tibble
. In general I like to err on the side of clarity so would rather stick with dep on tibble
. Sorry!
(suggest closing 🔓 )
That sounds good, no need to use tibble through dplyr!
Removed
tibble
dependency by changingtibble::tibble
todplyr::tibble
andtibble::as_tibble
todplyr::as_tibble
. Also rewrotetibble::enframe
in get_japan_regional_cases to rely only ondplyr
.