It seems the factors are the wrong way around in the antibody model. A reasonable assumption is:
1) Infections occur in those without antibodies, such raise the absolute level of antibodies without adjustment
2) Vaccinations are given randomly in the population, and thus the probability of ending up in people without antibodies is equal to the population proportion without antibodies.
It seems the factors are the wrong way around in the antibody model. A reasonable assumption is:
1) Infections occur in those without antibodies, such raise the absolute level of antibodies without adjustment 2) Vaccinations are given randomly in the population, and thus the probability of ending up in people without antibodies is equal to the population proportion without antibodies.
This PR reflects this assumption.