Closed biomystery closed 3 years ago
For the HCLTAFX2 I used the standard demultiplexing from 10x available with cellranger4.0. For HGG7MAFX2, i did two demultiplexing runs, the first one was the cellranger4.0 demultiplex with the added parameter --filter-dual-index. To get the single index, I used the following custom bcl2fastq
/projects/ps-epigen/software/bcl2fastq/bin/bcl2fastq --use-bases-mask Y28n,I8n,N10,Y90n* \
--run /projects/ps-epigen/nextSeq/200829_NB501692_0034_AHGG7MAFX2 \
--sample-sheet=/home/jbuchanan/20200829_SeqRun_singleIndex_bcl2fastq_custom.csv \
--output-dir /oasis/tscc/scratch/jbuchanan/demux_fastq \
--no-lane-splitting \
--ignore-missing-positions \
--ignore-missing-controls \
--ignore-missing-filter \
--ignore-missing-bcls \
--create-fastq-for-index-reads \
1243811 Now need justin to enter these seqruns into lims.
[error]
The samplesheet contains a sample with a single-index (i7 only) sample index,
but the flowcell was run in a dual-index (i7/i5) configuration. It is not
possible to demultiplex dual-indexed 10x samples and single-indexed 10x samples
within the same run of bcl2fastq. If you wish to proceed, please run mkfastq
with one of the following arguments:
--filter-dual-index: Only generate a samplesheet with the samples identified
by i7/i5 dual-indices (e.g., SI-TT-A6), ignoring single-
index samples. Single-index samples will not be
demultiplexed.
--filter-single-index: Only generate a samplesheet with samples identified
by an i7-only sample index, ignoring dual-indexed
samples. Dual-indexed samples will not be
demultiplexed.
NOTE: cellranger mkfastq no longer supports demultiplexing Single Cell 3' v1
flowcells. Please use cellranger 3.1 or earlier for that purpose.
--use-bases-mask Y28n*,I8n*,N10,Y90*
> --use-bases-mask Y28n*,I8n*,N10,Y90n*
HCLTAFX2
-> HCHLTAFX2
Run1
For the first run, I think that would be a good test for demultiplexing using the new cellranger 4.0 with the dual index system.
Run2
The second one is more tricky, but would be helpful in the long run, we did a custom bcl2fastq demux with single and dual index separately to get what we needed. Both runs used the run set up R1:28+R2:91+I1:10+I2:10.
https://ucsdepigenomics.slack.com/files/UBN894JTU/F01A0EYQN4X/2020-9-10_frank_test_sheet.xlsx