Open athowes opened 4 months ago
As a part of this issue, I propose to:
filter_obs_by_obs_time
and filter_obs_by_ptime
functions (perhaps could be merged into one function with an argument for p or s),roxygen2
documentation for these two functions.
In line with the
filter_obs_by_ptime()
function, I think it would be more descriptive and clear to have thefilter_obs_by_obs_time()
function be calledfilter_obs_by_stime()
: filter observations by the time of the secondary observation.Perhaps there is a question as to whether we want to be implementing "simple" operations like this, but if we are then I think the rename is a good idea.