search

epiverse-trace / blueprints

Software development blueprints for epiverse-trace
https://epiverse-trace.github.io/blueprints
Other
4 stars 4 forks source link

Remove confusing note about license compatibility #122

Closed jpavlich closed 2 weeks ago

jpavlich commented 2 weeks ago

…xes #18, since I believe what's already in the blueprints is sufficient.

Not much to add, I guess we shoul've closed this issue a long time ago.

netlify[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Deploy Preview for playful-gelato-7892ba ready!

Name Link
Latest commit 9f7504afda9b834c1b5079e929518e9c5b2ff83a
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/playful-gelato-7892ba/deploys/6720e3c993c7350008793c0e
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-122--playful-gelato-7892ba.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Bisaloo commented 2 weeks ago

I believe this is a tricky situation where all revolves around the very precise phrasing.

It is true that we don't want to copy GPL code in our packages because they would then probably have to be released at MIT. We can use GPL packages as dependencies without any issues though.

So maybe removing this sentence is indeed safer, even though it is accurate, to avoid confusion. What do you think?