This PR runs styler::style_pkg() to style the codebase (according to the tidyverse specs). I am introducing this PR because:
The package code style deviates from the general Epiverse-TRACE style
This deviation is not documented and creates ambiguity as to what style is applied
Because the style is not defined, it is unclear how to contribute in style code
It is also unclear whether the style is applied consistently throughout the current codebase
By running styler::style_pkg() I am attempting to create a baseline and ensure that future contributions can be confident. In case this is not desirable, I would like to request explicit documentation as to what code style is applied (e.g., in the package vignette). I realize we do not have hard standards on this in the blueprints at this time, and I do think there is value in a consistent and clear code style for the code, the maintainer, and for the contributors.
This PR runs
styler::style_pkg()to style the codebase (according to the tidyverse specs). I am introducing this PR because:By running
styler::style_pkg()I am attempting to create a baseline and ensure that future contributions can be confident. In case this is not desirable, I would like to request explicit documentation as to what code style is applied (e.g., in the package vignette). I realize we do not have hard standards on this in the blueprints at this time, and I do think there is value in a consistent and clear code style for the code, the maintainer, and for the contributors.