Closed willwhitney closed 10 years ago
@willwhitney - Just letting you know I've seen this, looks good. Going to review / test sometime later this week.
Cheers!
Awesome, thanks!
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Ryan Sandor Richards < notifications@github.com> wrote:
@willwhitney https://github.com/willwhitney - Just letting you know I've seen this, looks good. Going to review / test sometime later this week.
Cheers!
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/fastly/epoch/pull/132#issuecomment-51862766.
@willwhitney - Can you write up a rendering test for this in one or more of the time plot test suites? (see: tests/render/real-time/*.html
)
Sure, be glad to.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Ryan Sandor Richards < notifications@github.com> wrote:
@willwhitney https://github.com/willwhitney - Can you write up a rendering test for this in one or more of the time plot test suites? (see: tests/render/real-time/*.html)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/fastly/epoch/pull/132#issuecomment-52991241.
Any updates here? It would be great to have that working!
Ah sorry, was away for the last week or so. Looking into this now :)
This looks good, merging and setting up a documentation ticket.
Great, thanks!
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ryan Sandor Richards < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Merged #132 https://github.com/fastly/epoch/pull/132.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/fastly/epoch/pull/132#event-162784744.
@rsandor thanks!
Analogous to https://github.com/fastly/epoch/pull/117/, and so it's exactly the same change.
Additionally, removed the redundant
y()
function intime/line
to avoid having to duplicate that change in another place.