Closed paulo-ferraz-oliveira closed 3 years ago
I'm preemptively pushing a PR for this, since I've found some free time.
Unfortunately there's also functions from hamcrest
being called, which kind of makes the PR pointless (even though we can still use it).
While doing
rebar3 as test dialyzer
, which will eventually includemeck
in its analysis, I get warnings for references tohamcrest:
types (which are outside the scope of the analysis, sincehamcrest
is not imported).Would you be OK if I (PR) removed references to those types replacing them with an appropriate name and content?
e.g.
would become
(since there really is no strong link between the two anymore)